[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New -base release?
From: |
Sebastian Reitenbach |
Subject: |
Re: New -base release? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:38:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
SOGoMail 1.3.8 |
On Monday, August 15, 2011 22:27 CEST, Richard Frith-Macdonald
<richard@tiptree.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 15 Aug 2011, at 21:12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > to get back on this topic. Things look bright at the end of the tunnel, so
> > it would be nice to clean up some other small details before a shiny new
> > release.
> >
> > 1) locale / timezone on OpenBSD and FreeBSD.
> > [NSTimeZone systemTimeZone]
> > needs to return something sensible... (or all apps will complain at startup)
> > One thing to note is that apparently the "new" localtime is supported, but
> > the "old" not. I did check this only quickly with David on FreeBSD. Perhaps
> > fixing this fixes some other platforms too.
> >
> > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Rome: timezone data, version 2, 6 gmt time
> > flags, 6 std time flags, no leap seconds, 170 transition times, 6
> > abbreviation chars
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > /etc/localtime.bck: timezone data, old version, 6 gmt time flags, 6 std
> > time flags, no leap seconds, 170 transition times, 6 abbreviation chars
> >
> > (doesn't work)
>
> How do you find the timezone on Free/Open BSD? What we need for timezone
> support is some way to obtain, from the operating system, the correct
> timezone name (eg. GB-Eire or Europe/Rome)
> There's no standard way to do that, so we already have system-specific code
> to get the info via the most common methods, and there's no real reason we
> can't add more for other OS's.
At least speaking for OpenBSD, /etc/localtime is a symlink to the timezone. For
me it looks like this:
$ ls -l /etc/localtime
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 33 Feb 20 11:02 /etc/localtime ->
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin
Sebastian
>
>
> > 2) cygwin tmp files directory as shown in my tests
> >
> > 3) cygwin bundle support, at least with our own libobjc 1.6 (since it works
> > with mingw, it should for cygwin too)
> >
> > I would not consider cygwin blocking
>
> No, cygwin's an unsupported system so cannot be blocking ... but it would be
> great if some cygwin user could contribute cygwin specific code to support
> those features.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
- Re: New -base release?, (continued)
Re: New -base release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/08/15
- Re: New -base release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/08/15
- Re: New -base release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/08/15
- Re: New -base release?,
Sebastian Reitenbach <=
- Re: New -base release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/08/16
- Re: New -base release?, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2011/08/16
- Re: New -base release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/08/16
- Re: New -base release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/08/16
Re: New -base release?, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2011/08/16