discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failed gui test:NSView_autoresize_and_rounding WAS: gnustep compiled


From: Sebastian Reitenbach
Subject: Re: Failed gui test:NSView_autoresize_and_rounding WAS: gnustep compiled with clang and gworkspace problem
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:38:00 +0200
User-agent: SOGoMail 1.3.8

 
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:41 CEST, David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org> 
wrote: 
 
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 11:18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> 
> > Besides its ugly, and forces one more step to do on the user before he can 
> > use gnustep programs, is there any good advantage of using procfs instead 
> > of the fake main?
> > Will stuff be noticeably faster, more stable, whatever?
> 
> The fake main stuff is fragile, because it will break if the compilation unit 
> containing main() does not include the GNUstep headers.  For example, if you 
> have a main.c that then calls into some Objective-C stuff later, it won't 
> work.
> 
> On FreeBSD, we use kvm to get this, with some slight fudges.  I don't know if 
> the same code path works on OpenBSD - you can try it (you may need to enable 
> kvm in configure).

| #include "./config/config.proccmd.c"
configure:21341: result: no
configure:21351: checking for kvm_getenvv in -lkvm
configure:21386: clang -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g -O0  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include  
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c 
-lkvm   -lpthr
ead -lz >&5
configure:21393: $? = 0
configure:21414: result: yes
configure:21426: checking if we can access kernel memory
configure:21445: clang -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g -O0  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include  
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c 
-lkvm  -lpthre
ad -lz >&5
configure:21449: $? = 0
configure:21455: ./conftest
NSProcessInfo: /dev/null: not physical memory device
configure:21459: $? = 1

$ cat ./config/config.kvmopen.c
/*
 * Check to see if we can open the kernel memory. 
 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <kvm.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
int main()
{
  kvm_t *kptr = NULL;

  /* open the kernel */
  kptr = kvm_open(NULL, "/dev/null", NULL, O_RDONLY, "NSProcessInfo");
  return (kptr != NULL) ? 0 : 1;
}

The configure gets upset about the /dev/null

changing the /dev/null to NULL, and rerunning configure, I get this warning:

configure:21341: result: no
configure:21351: checking for kvm_getenvv in -lkvm
configure:21386: clang -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g -O0  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include  
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lo
cal/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -lkvm   -lpthread -lz >&5
configure:21393: $? = 0
configure:21414: result: yes
configure:21426: checking if we can access kernel memory
configure:21445: clang -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g -O0  -I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include  
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lo
cal/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -lkvm  -lpthread -lz >&5
configure:21449: $? = 0
configure:21455: ./conftest
NSProcessInfo: /dev/mem: Permission denied
configure:21459: $? = 1
configure: program exited with status 1

since a normal user is not in group kmem:

crw-r-----  1 root  kmem    2,   1 Sep 29 13:54 /dev/kmem
crw-r-----  1 root  kmem    2,   0 Sep 29 13:54 /dev/mem

Sebastian



> 
> David
> 
> -- Sent from my Cray X1 
 
 
 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]