[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC

From: Fergus Henderson
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:10:35 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On 12-Mar-2002, Gopal.V <address@hidden> wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > C and C++ are for language reasons very difficult to
> > compile to verifiable bytecode, and this is a problem
> > that we can't get around by starting from an AST instead
> > of starting from source code.
>       IL has "unmanaged" support for C++ stuff.

No.  "unmanaged" means native-code, not IL.

Probably you mean "unverifiable".

Fergus Henderson <address@hidden>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]