[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Platform testers wanted
From: |
Glenn Chambers |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Platform testers wanted |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:57:12 -0500 |
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 12:43 AM, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
We're coming down to the wire on pnet version 0.5.0. It's that time
again
when we need to make sure that all platforms work correctly.
So, I would appreciate reports from people on how well pnet works on
their
GNU/Linux distribution of choice, cygwin, mingw32, *BSD, Solaris,
MacOSX,
etc, etc, etc.
Tests so far:
NetBSD 1.5.5 on x86:
treecc, pnet, pnetlib build OK using 'gmake'. pnet & pnetlib 'cd test;
make check'
passed all tests. Tested all samples in both directories except
pnetlib/httpsrv,
all worked correctly.
pnetC fails to configure; /usr/bin/cpp is a shell script that
runs the real 'cpp', and it's choking on something it's being fed and
thinks it's
preprocessing STDIN, so it just hangs until you hit EOF during the C
compiler check.
I haven't tried to debug this beyond this point. I'll try to get back
to it tomorrow.
FreeBSD 4.4 on x86:
treecc, pnet, pnetlib build OK using 'gmake'. Tested the same as
NetBSD, with same
complete success.
pnetC configures and builds OK, but all samples that attempt to execute
a printf
call containing a format specifier dump core. (Segmentation error, if I
remember
correctly.) Hello.exe and Hello2.exe without any command line arguments
work, the
rest die.
I'll try to track this down as well.
I'll try to do a test on MacOS tomorrow as well. Not sure if I can get
a Solaris
test done this cycle; things are getting busy at work again.
Glenn Chambers
Toledo, OH
Re: [DotGNU]Platform testers wanted,
Glenn Chambers <=