[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug 130397
From: |
Agustin Martin |
Subject: |
Re: Bug 130397 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:48:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:30:10AM -0800, Ken Stevens wrote:
> Here is where most of the hassles with libraries occur. There may well
> be a much better way of encoding the character sets and interactions
> right now. Perhaps we should investigate simplifying and possibly
> removing the character set issues. We would still minimally need to
> communicate mode information to ispell.
>
There are still xemacs21-nomule packages flying around (at least in Debian).
But probably just not making them fully fail is enough, that is, working for
them with no reencodings at all.
--
Agustin
- Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary), Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/05
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/05
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/05
- Re: Bug 130397, Ken Stevens, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397,
Agustin Martin <=
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/08
- Re: Bug 130397, David Kastrup, 2005/01/08
- Re: Bug 130397, Miles Bader, 2005/01/09
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/09
- Re: Bug 130397, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/01/10
- Re: Bug 130397, David Kastrup, 2005/01/10
- Re: Bug 130397, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/01/10
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/13
- Re: Bug 130397, Peter Heslin, 2005/01/08
- Re: Bug 130397, Agustin Martin, 2005/01/07