[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs -Q not documented

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:45:01 +0200 (CEST)

> The difficulty in finding a long name for it reflected a lack of
> apparent coherence of the functionality of the option.  Nobody could
> see what it was good for.  That is why I thought of removing it or
> changing it.

Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
would normally like to have for daily work.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]