[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:14:22 -0400

    > The idea is to put the non-ASCII character in .emacs, without
    > modifiers.  If the user is using a method that handles non-modified
    > characters correctly, this should extend the method to handle modified
    > characters as well.

    > Isn't that valid?

    What does "that" refer to; to write (meta ?é), or your
    reasoning above?


    Anyway, it doesn't work on Windows if .emacs is editted and
    saved as a multibyte buffer.

Why not?  It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
the file, and converted into the proper character code.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]