[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:29:07 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.95 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Why not?  It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
> the file, and converted into the proper character code.

>     That part is ok.  The problem is that the current Windows
>     code generates an event M-\351 instead of M-é.

> Isn't that a bug?  It ought to handle the é the same regardless of
> the modifiers.

I think it's a bug.  It surely handles the é the same
regardless of the modifiers.  In both cases, it doesn't
decode the key event \351 to é.  Windows code ask
encoded-kbd-mode to decode it.  And, although
Encoded-kbd-mode can decode \351 to é, it can't decode
M-\351 to M-é.

Kenichi Handa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]