[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:30:49 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.95 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     Anyway, it doesn't work on Windows if .emacs is editted and
>     saved as a multibyte buffer.

> Why not?  It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
> the file, and converted into the proper character code.

That part is ok.  The problem is that the current Windows
code generates an event M-\351 instead of M-é.

"\351" will be different depending on one's locale.

Kenichi Handa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]