[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:32:38 -0400 |
I think it's a bug. It surely handles the é the same
regardless of the modifiers. In both cases, it doesn't
decode the key event \351 to é. Windows code ask
encoded-kbd-mode to decode it. And, although
Encoded-kbd-mode can decode \351 to é, it can't decode
M-\351 to M-é.
That sounds like a clear bug in encoded-kbd-mode. Can you fix it
easily?
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/13
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/25
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/29