[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:42:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
> In principle it could work to make "file set" a general term, if we
> have two suitable specific terms for the two specific concepts used in
> these two features. But that proposal has trouble in the details:
> if we use the terms "VC fileset" and "fileset", it sounds like the
> former is a special case of the latter.
>
> Can you modify it to solve the problem?
That's easy. The real difference isn't between "used in VC" and elsewhere,
it's in the lifetime and source of the fileset.
A few additions to the manual can address this.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, (continued)
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Miles Bader, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/13
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/14
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/21
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12