[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:27:20 -0400 |
But that proposal has trouble in the details:
> if we use the terms "VC fileset" and "fileset", it sounds like the
> former is a special case of the latter.
>
> Can you modify it to solve the problem?
That's easy. The real difference isn't between "used in VC" and elsewhere,
it's in the lifetime and source of the fileset.
I think that would be a confusing way to describe the situation.
These two "kinds of filesets" are different data types, with totally
different commands.
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, (continued)
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Miles Bader, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/13
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/14
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/19
- Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12