[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:01:16 +0300 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
> <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:11:44 -0700
>
> > What bothers me a lot is that there doesn't seem to be a good way of
> > finding options relevant to some topic. The various `apropos'
> > commands we have are ad-hoc and rely on strings in symbol names or
> > documentation. What is missing is the ability to associate keywords
> > with symbols, akin to index entries we put in manuals. But first and
> > foremost, someone will have to come up with a useful set of keywords
> > (those used by finder.el are not even close).
>
> The words in doc strings serve pretty well as (ad-hoc) keywords -
> `apropos-documentation'.
Not well enough, IMO.
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Sean O'Rourke, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10