[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:08:44 +0900 |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> This is a side question, but I have been wondering for a while why Emacs
> doesn't have CL keyword arguments. Is there a reason? I looked in the
> Elisp manual, but didn't see anything.
They're complicated and inefficient?
Certainly there are cases where they're the best thing, but the CL core
seems to use them _way_ too much... forcing users to parse their own
keywords makes the complexity more obvious, and hopefully avoids
overuse.
-Miles
--
Joy, n. An emotion variously excited, but in its highest degree arising from
the contemplation of grief in another.
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/12
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/12
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/14
- Re: Emacs Package Management, David Kastrup, 2009/09/14
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Miles Bader, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Geoff Gole, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17