Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries

[Lennart Borgman]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:39 +0100
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100
>> >> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>> >>
>> >> >> > Because it's pointless.  If we want to give users release binaries
>> >> >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please explain why you think that.
>> >> >
>> >> > I just did, above.
>> >>
>> >> In what way is "pointless" an explanation?
>> >
>> > I meant the second sentence.
>>
>> Can you then explain if you think there is any reason not to ship the
>> release binaries with debug info?
>
> I said it is slightly better, that's all.  The reason is disk space,
> of course: 30MB is a lot for a binary.

Why do you then think it is pointless to ship both binaries with debug
info and without it?