[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:06:09 +0200 |
> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:06:42 +0100
> Cc: Sean Sieger <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> I offer the same question as I did before: Is there any advantage of
> shipping both binaries with debug info and without it? (In separate
> downloads, of course.)
You never made clear that you are talking about separate downloads,
until now.
Having separate downloads is fine, assuming that Sean (or whoever
prepares the zip archives) can handle the extra workload.
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, (continued)
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Jason Rumney, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/24
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Sean Sieger, 2010/11/25
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2010/11/23
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/23
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2010/11/24
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/24