[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert c
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal. |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:15:25 -0800 |
> > Dunno.
>
> But you write a lot for someone who do not know. :)
I said I do not know whether color-lab.el "doesn't have much to do with
hexrgb.el" (Lars). I did not say that I do not know anything. I wrote about
what I do know about: hexrgb.el.
What did I mean by "dunno" here? Read what followed "dunno":
d> Dunno. Such a particular color distance computation is I guess
d> complementary to what is in hexrgb.el. But in general that is
d> the kind of thing that hexrgb.el does.
So wrt particular content: it seems _complementary_. But in general, color
difference _is_ the kind of thing that hexrgb.el does. So yes and no - dunno
based only on Lars's general description of color-lab.el.
> All of this is not present in hexrgb
Complementary.
> I admit: color-lab has 50 SLOC for 2 functions (rgb->hsl and rgb->hsv)
> which are in hexrgb, but they are even not used at all by the
> CIE code.
I already made it clear during the discussion of rainbow-mode.el that such
overlap is to be expected. These are just standard color conversions.
> So I think it's really unfair to stand up and point at this
> package like it's something that should not have been done.
>
> Now if you want to merge hexrgb and color-lab, why not, but stop
> pointing at other people work because some is not included in Emacs.
>
> I can't do anything about it.
You replied to my mail, but is this directed at me or someone else? I haven't
pointed at any package as something that should not have been done. I haven't
pointed at anyone's work because something is not in Emacs (?). "Really
unfair", indeed.
I simply replied to Yidong's mention of possibly including hexrgb.el (it's OK).
And to Lars's indication that color-lab.el was about calculating a color
distance and that (he thinks) that has little to do with hexrgb.el. I was going
by what Lars described - I have not looked at color-lab.el myself.
Whether color-lab.el _in fact_ has anything to do with hexrgb.el (e.g. same or
similar subject) I dunno. And even if it does, whether the two should be
included separately or merged in some way I dunno. I am not pushing for either
inclusion or merger. I am not pushing and I am not pointing. ;-)
To be clear, I do not really care whether hexrgb.el, color-lab.el, some
combination of them, or both of them are added to Emacs. I tried to reply
technically to the question of what hexrgb.el is about. That's all.
I wrote hexrgb.el for myself and anyone else who wants to use it. I am glad
that someone wrote color-lab.el as well. Heuristically determining readable
colors would be useful - I'm glad you're working on it.
Whether any of this stuff should be added to Emacs is another story, and not for
me to decide.
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., (continued)
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Drew Adams, 2010/11/23
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Julien Danjou, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/24
- Use color-tweaking code to improve face defaults? [was: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r1...], Drew Adams, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/24
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal.,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/24
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el(shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal withshr-color->hexadecimal., Drew Adams, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el(shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal withshr-color->hexadecimal., Julien Danjou, 2010/11/24
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el(shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal withshr-color->hexadecimal., Drew Adams, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Chong Yidong, 2010/11/24
- RE: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Drew Adams, 2010/11/23
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check): Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Richard Stallman, 2010/11/24
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check): Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/24
Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check): Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal., Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/23