[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
Dave Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:28:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) |
on Wed Oct 26 2011, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Martin recently introduced the command names
>>>
>>> split-window-above-each-other -> C-x 2
>>> split-window-side-by-side -> C-x 3
>>>
>>> for which split-window-{vertically|horizontally} are now aliases.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> split-window-and-stack-horizontally
>> split-window-and-stack-vertically
>>
>> or
>>
>> split-window-and-arrange-horizontally
>> split-window-and-arrange-vertically
>
> I like Tim's suggestion.
>
> Another variation of my earlier suggestion would be
>
> split-window-and-tile-horizontally
> split-window-and-tile-vertically
+1
Another approach might be to get more specific and say where, relative
to the existing window, the new window will appear:
create-window-right
create-window-below
tile-window-right
tile-window-below
subtile-window-right
subtile-window-below
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Dave Abrahams <=
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Ulrich Mueller, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26