[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:08:45 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
>         Jan Djärv
>  <address@hidden>,
>         address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:32:14 -0400
> > If jit-lock timers are firing too often, that could certainly be fixed
> > too, as there's nothing inherent about that which requires frequently
> > firing timers when idle (or even when active, if all jit-locking has
> > been completed and jit-lock'd buffers haven't changed)...
> Jit lock doesn't run any timers by default

Yes, and neither does "emacs -Q".  Like I said: we've just made 
"emacs -Q" battery-friendly.

> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that
> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer).

I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]