Re: Patch queue management systems

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:

> It could be more fine-grained, only protecting certain branches
> (master, emacs-*, etc.).  Then people can push to "username/feature"
> branches and maintainers can merge into a protected branch.

"username/feature" sounds like a good naming scheme and one that could
cut down on the inevitable clutter (implicit blame).

(and I still think having a separate feature branch git repository is a
good idea.  If that repository resides on the same server and is created
with hardlinks to the real repo, it should also be cheap
disk-usage-wise, at least initially....)