Re: Patch queue management systems

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:28 +0100 Steinar Bang <address@hidden> wrote: 

>>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
>> It could be more fine-grained, only protecting certain branches
>> (master, emacs-*, etc.).  Then people can push to "username/feature"
>> branches and maintainers can merge into a protected branch.

SB> "username/feature" sounds like a good naming scheme and one that could
SB> cut down on the inevitable clutter (implicit blame).

SB> (and I still think having a separate feature branch git repository is a
SB> good idea.

Yeah, it would make allowing non-fast-forward pushes easier.

SB> If that repository resides on the same server and is created with
SB> hardlinks to the real repo, it should also be cheap disk-usage-wise,
SB> at least initially....)

Eh.

Ted