[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 02:50:51 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 |
On 04/25/2015 09:56 PM, address@hidden (João Távora) wrote:
While we're on the subject, is a patch welcome to set
`xref-find-function' to `elisp-xref-find' more pervasively in the
apropos, debugger and help buffers?
I'm fine with that, but the effect will also make it harder for Eli to
undo that change. :) Dunno how important that is.
See http://debbugs.gnu.org/19466.
The patch attached does this to a certain degree, but takes some care to
not do this is the major mode's definitions, since in theory these modes
could be used for something other than emacs-lisp.
Makes sense.
On the other hand, should we care? Currently, M-. in the *Help* buffer
always prompts to find a tag, which is less useful (if not useless) than
having it try to navigate to an elisp symbol definition.
If you run 'make tags', it'll create lisp/TAGS linked with src/TAGS, the
former containing the core Lisp definitions. Though not any third-party
ones.
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
index ce5c786..7585215 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
@@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ That buffer should be current already."
(with-current-buffer (car tem)
(point))))
(pop tem))))
- (debugger-make-xrefs))
+ (debugger-make-xrefs)
+ (setq-local xref-find-function #'elisp-xref-find))
Both this and the other places should probably set
xref-identifier-completion-table-function as well. You could extract
those three lines from emacs-lisp-mode.
+(advice-add 'describe-mode :after #'help--setup-xref-find-function)
+(advice-add 'describe-function :after #'help--setup-xref-find-function)
+(advice-add 'describe-variable :after #'help--setup-xref-find-function)
+(advice-add 'describe-bindings :after #'help--setup-xref-find-function)
Why not add the call to the command definitions directly?
- Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/23
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28