[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-f
From: |
Vitalie Spinu |
Subject: |
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:45:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:17:31 +0300 wrote:
>>
>> For non-emacs documentation other xref backends are not that
>> meaningful IMW.
> ??? Please see the list of non-Lisp packages I showed in a previous
> message: each one of them features a more or less complex programming
> language that very much can benefit from xref-style functionality.
This is obviously true. My point was different.
If you need to choose a default backend in info mode, xref-eslips is
more useful than xref-etags which is the current default. If you set a
tag table, it will be for one language (at least one location). How does
it help you reading glibc, Gawk, GDB, Make, Guile ...?
Vitalie
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, (continued)
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/25
- xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions,
Vitalie Spinu <=
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29