[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-f
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:01:58 +0300 |
> From: Vitalie Spinu <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:45:00 +0200
>
> > ??? Please see the list of non-Lisp packages I showed in a previous
> > message: each one of them features a more or less complex programming
> > language that very much can benefit from xref-style functionality.
>
> This is obviously true. My point was different.
>
> If you need to choose a default backend in info mode, xref-eslips is
> more useful than xref-etags which is the current default.
Only if most of your manuals are for Lisp-related packages. If not,
it will be as useless as xref-etags.
IOW, "more useful" does not necessarily mean "useful enough". We need
to be smarter than either of these two as a single default back-end.
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, (continued)
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/25
- xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29