[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-f
From: |
Vitalie Spinu |
Subject: |
Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:59:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> (João Távora)on Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:41:19 +0100 wrote:
>> Maybe obvious, but this struggle with the choice of the
>> default backend wouldn't be there if xref was able to merge backends.
> I don't see how. How would we remove elisp-xref-find as a backend in
> certain help-mode contexts without touching the code where such
> contexts are setup.
Then xref-etags + xref-elisp grouped backend can be the default
everywhere except when it's explicitly redefined.
>> (FWIW, I would also like to have elisp xref in info mode.)
> But only for the elisp manual, right?
For all info actually. There are a lot of emacs packages in info for
which xref-elisp is meaningful. For non-emacs documentation other xref
backends are not that meaningful IMW.
BTW, this is potentially one good user case for the proposed contextual
dispatch in cl-generic. You might want dispatch xref on context more
refined than major-mode, emacs related info pages in this case.
Vitalie
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, (continued)
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/25
- Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/25
- xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/26
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, João Távora, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions,
Vitalie Spinu <=
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/29
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/28
- Re: xref backends for elisp-related modes Was: Re: Bad moves with xref-find-definitions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/28