[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ELPA policy

From: John Wiegley
Subject: Re: ELPA policy
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:17 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)

>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and
> seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in
> the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says
> Maintainer: emacs-devel.

If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit
surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being
provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]