[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ELPA policy

From: Nicolas Petton
Subject: Re: ELPA policy
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:44:34 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el
> and seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core?  I don't see
> stream.el in the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp,
> and it says Maintainer: emacs-devel.

stream.el is currently in ELPA, which can make some sense, but regarding
seq.el, I think it should really stay in the core.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]