[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ELPA policy

From: Artur Malabarba
Subject: Re: ELPA policy
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:05:45 +0000

On 9 Nov 2015 10:06 pm, "John Wiegley" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and
> > seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in
> > the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says
> > Maintainer: emacs-devel.
> If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit
> surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being
> provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer.

Seq.el was put on Gelpa so that it can be used by emacsen < 25. I'm very grateful for that as I use it as a dependency in quite a few of my packages already.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]