[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ELPA policy

From: Nicolas Petton
Subject: Re: ELPA policy
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:47:14 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

> If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit
> surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA,

In the case of seq.el, it's for backward-compatibility.  It made it
possible for instance for CIDER devs to start using it while Emacs 25 is
still in progress.

> unless it was being
> provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer.

IIRC, Stefan thought that having stream.el in the ELPA meant more sense
at least until people start using it more.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]