[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-der

From: Leo Liu
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:10:59 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (OS X 10.11.3)

On 2016-03-06 13:01 -0800, John Wiegley wrote:
> Wouldn't it change the way old code might get re-indented? In other
> words, was this a no-op addition of metadata, or did it have aesthetic
> impact on the way code gets indented?

I think it is a misunderstanding that missing a (indent N) in an
oversight when it is actually a deliberate design. A lot of the def-ish
macros have this pattern. See the doc-string of lisp-indent-function.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]