[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-der

From: Leo Liu
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:41:59 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (OS X 10.11.3)

On 2016-03-05 15:32 +0200, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Then we can consider them a separate argument. Since it's not
> delimited with parens, what better way to emphasize it than to put it
> on a separate line?

So what's your point of bringing up semantics in the first place? I am
totally lost.

>> They actually affect how code is generated. The BODY has at most 3
>> semantic parts: DOC, KEYWORDS and BODY2. The first 2 are optional. My
>> style is not bizarre and to my eye make the code clear. Everyone has
>> own lisp style and we should do our best to respect them.
> Not if we lose out in functionality in other places

Still missing the point. I don't mind if you exert some style in a new
macro. But this is a macro that has been there since at least 22.1.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]