[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:36:29 +0300

> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:07:02 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> > From: Achim Gratz <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:13:50 +0200
> > > Sure, we can come up with use cases where it makes sense to use these
> > > features together in the same file, but I think use cases where they
> > > are unrelated are much more abundant.
> > 
> > Cases of using a computer that do not involve the Emacs are also
> > abundant, I hope you agree that this as not an argument against Emacs.
> You are missing the point.  The point is how much of the basic
> functionality one needs to master before they can use a single feature
> of a large package.  If the answer for your Emacs analogy is "too
> much", then it _is_ indeed an argument "against Emacs".

Btw, while there might be a sufficient justification for having a high
entry bar into Emacs, having yet another high bar _inside_ Emacs for
using one of its features is an additional annoyance, and so not a
good thing.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]