[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Continuous integration
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Continuous integration |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:37:42 +0000 address@hidden (Phillip Lord) wrote:
PL> Ultimately, if our main criteria for a CI and code review system is
PL> "does it work with EWW" or "can we have an emacs interface", then I
PL> think that it's likely we are going to end up with something that is
PL> poorly functional. Picking a good system and then making Emacs work with
PL> it seems a better way forward.
Agreed; it's probably going to be possible to use the GitLab API. It's
pretty thorough https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/README.html
Ted
- Re: Continuous integration, (continued)
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, T.V Raman, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Chad Brown, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Yuri Khan, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/25
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/27