[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Continuous integration
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Continuous integration |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:59:42 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:07:39 -0000
> From: "Phillip Lord" <address@hidden>
>
> 1) Are John, Eli and the other devels interested and willing to sanction
> adding this form of infrastructure (even as a trial)
Why do you need a sanction? AFAIU, this doesn't require anything from
the project, once there are volunteers willing to set this up. Am I
missing something?
- Re: Continuous integration, (continued)
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Chad Brown, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Yuri Khan, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/25
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/03/27
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/30
- Re: Continuous integration, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/30
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/30
- Re: Continuous integration, John Wiegley, 2017/03/29