[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:38:49 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:24:51 -0700
>
> On 07/17/2018 10:03 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > And then maintain local patches, and apply them every time we sync
> > with upstream GMP? I'd rather we avoided that burden.
>
> That's OK, we can put it into Gnulib and then let the Gnulib maintainers
> worry about it.
Then we'd need to coordinate with Gnulib, which further complicates
maintenance for us.
I don't understand why this is needed, given that Tom published a
proposed solution for the issue. If you are bothered by possible
run-time penalty for LP64 systems, we can use compile-time checks
instead of run-time checks. So I really don't see any justification
for more elaborate schemes.
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/07/18