|
From: | Alex |
Subject: | Renaming non-X x_* procedures in xdisp.c (and elsewhere) |
Date: | Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:07:04 -0600 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
It would be helpful to determine at a glance whether or not a procedure is generic or depends on X support. I'm guessing that this naming scheme is a historical artifact from when graphical support meant X support, but I believe that it is more confusing than it is worth at this point. For example, x_write_glyphs could become disp_write_glyphs.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |