[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:00:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 2/26/20 7:48 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
FWIW, you have a +1 from me, tho I don't see any urgency so I'd keep it
for `master`.
I agree with Stefan on both points.
The bug noted by Andreas should also be fixed. More specifically, I
suggest having Emacs diagnose the typo only when GNU grep diagnoses it,
as it's better to be consistent among GNU applications. Grep diagnoses
the contents of [...] if all the following are true:
* The first character is ":".
* The last character is ":".
* There is some non-":" character.
* There are no ranges, char/equiv classes or collation elements.
GNU grep has done this for about a decade and this has worked well. If
we don't like these rules we can change them but I would then suggest we
also change GNU grep to be consistent.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/25
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28