[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:45:33 -0800 (PST) |
> > Maybe there is a way to do it that won't be confusing.
> > If it waits until you type RET to finish the regexp.
> > then flashes a warning on the screen for two seconds or until there is
> > more input, it might be clear and not annoying.
>
> We could also have `read-regexp` show a warning *on the side* while you
> type the input, a bit like isearch does when the regexp is
> incomplete/invalid.
>
> It would also make sense to make `read-regexp` emit such warnings about
> incomplete/invalid regexps.
Both suggestions sound good.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/24
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/25
- RE: :alnum: broken?,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/25
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/25
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26