[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:08:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:36:41AM -0400, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> On 27/04/2020 07.31, address@hidden wrote:
[...]
> > If you want Emacs to adapt in this point, it's on you to convince
> > Emacs people that this change is important.
>
> FWIW, I don't find the comparison to speaking German very convincing either.
All metaphors suck in some way. My point is... I've seen all
too often this antipattern: some enters an existing culture
and shouts into the room "hey, why are you doing this in such
a weird way? Come do it this other way I propose, it's much
better!".
I think if you want to convince people, you might want to go
a bit smarter about that :-)
> > You haven't managed to convince me [...]
> Neither have you managed to convince me that mouse-1-2-3 is valuable.
Fair enough.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, (continued)
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
RE: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Drew Adams, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, chad, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Tim Cross, 2020/04/27
RE: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Drew Adams, 2020/04/27