[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PL support

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: PL support
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 02:19:20 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 10.05.2020 01:23, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
On 09/05/2020 17.49, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
On 09.05.2020 22:55, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
Let's not be too hasty with calling the debate silly.  I don't use either lsp-mode or 
eglot but I do see strong opinions in favor of both, and "blessing" one as 
official, especially a (currently) less popular one, can cause sour feelings and give the 
perception that emacs-devel is being insular.
In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well, we*should*  
present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction videos, 
documentation, tutorials, etc.
But why more than lsp-mode?

Because they choose to participate in the "core" Emacs development very little?

And because they chose not to get included in GNU ELPA, which would be a "reward" in itself (oob availability for new users). We couldn't mention packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently anyway.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]