[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes for emacs 28

From: Robert Pluim
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:39:20 +0200

>>>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:47 +0000, Gregory Heytings <ghe@sdf.org> said:

    >> Yes, that matches the Mailman documentation. Iʼm not sure what a
    >> good solution is; Mailman adding a Reply-To with both the sender and
    >> emacs-devel would no doubt also break either Outlook or rmail or
    >> both. Not adding a Reply-To at all means the sender would get
    >> dropped <sigh>.

    Gregory> In fact not adding a Reply-To would be perfect, at least for
    Gregory> me. Presumably someone who sends a message to a list has 
subscribed to
    Gregory> the list, of if they are not, it's common to mention explicitly 
    Gregory> they are not.

That works if their email address is mentioned in one of the headers
of the message, but in this case yours wouldnʼt be (unless you CC
yourself explicitly, which is an imposition on the sender)

DMARC/DKIM/SPF, what hath ye wrought?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]