[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes for emacs 28

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:32:35 +0300

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:52:49 +0200
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>,
>  Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>     Gregory> Indeed.  I know this, but I don't know why this is the case (*). 
>  I
>     Gregory> used to explicitly set Reply-To to emacs-devel@gnu.org in my 
> MUA, but
>     Gregory> Eli asked me to stop to do this.
> I think in that case rmail replies only to emacs-devel@, which means
> Eli has to add back the other recipients. Eli, do we need a "reply to
> 'From+To+CC+Reply-To'" feature in rmail? ("wide reply" in Gnus parlance).

I don't think I understand what that means (never used Gnus, sorry),
and don't remember the details of the issue.  But in general, why
would someone need to set Reply-To to the list address when replying
to a message from the list?  It should be automatic in any sensible
MUA, no?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]