Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter

[Andrei Kuznetsov]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> TS's code is written in plain C, and doesn't require any regeneration
> or source modifications.  Anything else is misunderstanding.

I am confused by TS's documentation, but if my understanding is correct,
shouldn't it be a parser generator that generates C code?  In that case,
how would users load new parsers or modify existing ones?  Perhaps
through something similar to the existing native module support?

I might be making a grave misunderstanding (or several)