Re: Tree-sitter api

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> As mentioned before, we don't want to use shorthands for core
> features

Ah, okay, I must've missed that.

> and I'm not even sure there's a good way of doing that when some of
> the feature is in primitives written in C.

Why would shorthands behave specially with C primitives, since
shorthands work on the reader-level?

Thanks.