Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond

[Emanuel Berg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> No text terminal can support all the key combinations a GUI
> display can.

Why ever not?

> The Linux console is abysmally inadequate for Emacs, from
> where I stand.

In terms of text, what's missing?

But it is atypical for Linux because it isn't feature-rich,
they don't try to make it better, and they don't add stuff,
this is a policy, even.

But if one uses feature-rich systems on top of it or with it,
for example tmux which is very common, here Emacs as we have
heard, zsh, etc, I don't see how they should be limited
by it, really?

But it is possible/likely that fbterm, if that is the
feature-rich option then, that the other posted suggested in
this thread, that that is indeed more powerful and offers
a more consistent configuration and extension interface,
active development and all that ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal