[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

From: João Távora
Subject: Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:57:19 +0100

I don't think so. It could, somewhat but would be akward. Gerd's suggestion is much a much more natural way to solve this bike shed. At the Lisp symbol level, at least. At the package level (as in Elisp .el  file names) it does nothing for this particular semiotic bike shed.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 08:43 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:25:19 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com
> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
>  > At the very least, we should consider adding some alias, like
>  > `start-lsp', and/or `lsp-start'.[2]
> Wouldn't it be nice if Emacs had CL packages?  Then everyone could add
> superior names as a package nickname.  That would make bikeshedding much
> easier :-).

Does shorthands.el fit the bill?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]