[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eglot-test-diagnostic-tags-unnecessary-code fails with certain clang

From: João Távora
Subject: Re: eglot-test-diagnostic-tags-unnecessary-code fails with certain clangd versions
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:57:25 +0000

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 4:34 PM Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:26:14 +0000, João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> 
> >>>>> said:
>     João> I don't think the test should be marked unstable, as it is not
>     João> really that: it's pretty stable.  So let's install Robert's
>     João> upcoming patch (using version<= and a helper)
> I wonʼt get to that today.

I can get to that later, but I have no useful way to test.

>     João> and considering upgrading
>     João> clangd soon via one of those methods.  It's not very useful to have
>     João> a version of clangd in EMBA that doesn't represent very well what
>     João> people are using.
> I run Debian stable because itʼs, well, stable, and I suspect many
> others do as well, so having clangd not be the latest and greatest is
> not going to be unusual.

I don't think so.  Clangd is not a web server where stability is
paramount, it's a developer's tool,  so I would suppose a newer
version is what's needed.  My experience with Eglot+clangd users
tells me so overwhelmingly.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]