Re: eglot-test-diagnostic-tags-unnecessary-code fails with certain clangd versions

[João Távora]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:55 PM Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi João,
>
> >> Even the recent upgrade from Debian stretch to Debian bullseye on EMBA
> >> has caused trouble, see for example bug#62210 or bug#62211.
> >
> > I'm not suggesting a full system upgrade.
>
> Perhaps we can move eglot-tests to a different (Debian) environment, say
> in the platform-images and platforms stages, or so. Don't know, I'm just
> thinking randomly :-)

I don't understand the EMBA structure at all.  I thought it would be
basically  "make check", but there are all kinds of
subjobs/stages/pipelines forming a CI/CD model I'm not familiar with.
I can't really figure out what is passing as it should or
failing as it shouldn't.

I don't think the test should be marked unstable, as it is not
really that: it's pretty stable.  So let's install Robert's
upcoming patch (using version<= and a helper) and considering upgrading
clangd soon via one of those methods.  It's not very useful to have
a version of clangd in EMBA that doesn't represent very well what
people are using.

João