Re: Stability of core packages (was: Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot)

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 20/04/2023 17:42, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The main downsides of this are probably obvious:
> >
> > - The development work required.
> > - The additional ongoing package maintenance work that is implied by
> > this design.
> Agreed.  I just don't see how will we be ever able to move to keeping
> core packages only on ELPA if we don't transition to such a system, or
> something like it.

When you say "keeping core packages only on ELPA", what do you mean exactly?