emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last ch


From: Philip Kaludercic
Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change.
Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:44:01 +0000

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:24:26 +0000
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> but on my system, it immediately suggests upgrading 24 packages, which
>> >> is a lot.
>> >
>> > Can you show the list of those 24 packages?
>> 
>> I am on a different system now, so the prompt differs slightly and have
>> other updates, but this is what it looks like:
>> 
>> Packages to install: 23 (xref-1.6.3
>> verilog-mode-2022.12.18.181110314 use-package-2.4.5 tramp-2.6.0.4
>> svg-1.1 soap-client-3.2.1 so-long-1.1.2 python-0.28 project-0.9.8
>> org-9.6.5 ntlm-2.1.0 nadvice-0.4 map-3.3.1 let-alist-1.0.6
>> jsonrpc-1.0.17 flymake-1.3.4 external-completion-0.1 erc-5.5
>> eldoc-1.14.0 eglot-1.15 cl-lib-0.7.1 cl-generic-0.3 bind-key-2.4.1).
>> Packages to upgrade: 2 (editorconfig-0.9.1 inspector-0.29).
>> Proceed? (y or n)
>
> I see nothing unexpected in this list.  And since the feature is
> opt-in, what are the dangers of having it?

There is no danger, it might just be overwhelming?  I was a bit
surprised at first.  But if you think it is fine, then I have no
objections.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]